Approximately three decades ago, the internet catalyzed a seismic shift in American business growth. The ability to transcend physical limitations and engage with a global audience through the simple click of a mouse has propelled enterprises to unparalleled heights.
Yet, since the emergence of the internet, investors and analysts have yearned for a revolutionary trend that could match its transformative impact. While various technologies have surfaced over the years, none have come close to replicating the internet’s revolutionary effect — until now.
Image source: Getty Images.
The ascent of artificial intelligence (AI) has stirred excitement among both professional and everyday investors, and with good reason. The capacity of AI-driven technologies to enhance performance and potentially acquire new skills autonomously renders them invaluable across myriad global sectors.
One of the most staggering forecasts regarding AI’s impact stems from PwC’s “Sizing the Prize” report, projecting a $15.7 trillion boost to the global economy by 2030 solely due to the artificial intelligence revolution.
While optimism abounds in the realm of AI, a distinct lack of conviction plagues the companies leading this revolutionary charge.
The Meteoric Rise of Nvidia, Broadcom, and AMD
A cursory glance at the stock performances of premier AI firms reveals their enduring strength. Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has amassed over $3 trillion in market cap since early 2023, while Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) have chalked up formidable gains of 216% and 141%, respectively, in under two years. Undoubtedly, AI acts as the primary driver of this exceptional outperformance.
Nvidia’s GPUs have spearheaded this surge, serving as the neural power behind lightning-fast decision-making in AI-enhanced data centers. The unprecedented demand for the H100 GPU, known as the “Hopper,” has enabled Nvidia to command premiums ranging from 100% to 300% for its chips, resulting in a significant uptick in the company’s adjusted gross margin.
Although Advanced Micro Devices entered the AI arena post Nvidia, its more economical MI300X AI GPUs continue to garner substantial interest. Given Nvidia’s chip scarcity, established players like AMD stand poised to divert AI GPU orders from the former.
Recently, AMD revealed its next-gen AI GPU, the Instinct MI325X, designed to rival Nvidia’s upcoming Blackwell GPU architecture. Production of AMD’s new chip is slated to commence later this year, minimizing any head start for Blackwell.
Moreover, Broadcom has emerged as a favored option for businesses seeking AI networking solutions. While Broadcom boasts a diverse portfolio beyond AI, including wireless chips for cutting-edge smartphones, its Jericho3-AI fabric stands out for reducing tail latency and maximizing AI GPU capabilities in high-compute data centers, driving a significant portion of the company’s current sales growth.
On the surface, all signs point to continued upward trajectory for these AI frontrunners… until one delves into their insider transactions.
Image source: Getty Images.
Unveiling Wall Street’s AI Conviction Conundrum
Insights from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan, and AMD CEO Lisa Su signify robust demand for AI solutions, as evidenced by their companies’ robust growth rates. Yet, despite the apparent optimism, insider actions within these leading AI firms reveal a disconcerting lack of conviction among Wall Street’s AI torchbearers.
Whenever an insider of a publicly traded company – be it a board member or high-ranking executive – engages in the purchase or sale of their firm’s stock, stringent disclosure requirements mandate full transparency.
Insider Selling at Leading Technology Companies Raises Concerns
Uneven Selling Activity among Top Tech Companies
Recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission reveal a noteworthy trend – insider selling has been prevalent at three prominent tech giants over the past year.
- Nvidia: 83 insider sales (25 from Jensen Huang) and 0 insider purchases
- Broadcom: 32 insider sales (eight from Hock Tan) and 0 insider purchases
- AMD: 23 insider sales (eight from Lisu Su) and 0 insider purchases
Altogether, these companies have witnessed a total of 138 insider sales, indicating a lack of confidence from within.
While insider sales can have legitimate reasons, the absence of open-market purchases raises questions about the faith insiders have in their own companies.
Lack of Insider Purchases Sends a Disturbing Signal
It has been quite some time since key executives at these tech companies have shown faith in their stocks through insider purchases. The gap in insider buying is stark:
Nvidia – 46 months, Broadcom – 13 months, and a staggering over five years since the last insider buy at AMD.
Investors are left to ponder – if insiders themselves are hesitant, why should the general public rush to invest in technology that is yet to prove its mettle?
Signs Point to Caution for Potential Investors
The absence of insider purchases at Nvidia, Broadcom, and AMD throws a shadow of doubt over the industry’s future prospects. While insider selling can be rationalized, the dearth of buying activity sends a strong signal.
Investors should approach these stocks with a balanced perspective, weighing the potential risks associated with a lack of confidence from within the companies.