The stock market is a battlefield, and in the realm of Chinese companies this fight has been particularly brutal. Despite the broader market hitting unprecedented highs, Chinese companies have been taking a beating. The ongoing political tensions between the U.S. and China, coupled with the murkiness surrounding China’s future path, have rattled investors and sent many running for the hills.

However, while many are fleeing, contrarian investors are eyeing certain well-established Chinese gems that may be ripe for the picking in the long run. Among these glittering prizes are Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU) and JD.com (NASDAQ: JD).

Image source: Getty Images.

Exploring Business Models of Baidu and JD

In the complex tapestry of the Chinese tech landscape, Baidu and JD.com stand as prominent survivors from a bygone tech era. They have morphed from their humble origins – Baidu as a search engine and JD.com in e-commerce – into the behemoths they are today. Yet, beneath the surface, their business models diverge significantly.

Baidu, often likened to the Google of China, reigns supreme as the leading search engine in the country. Boasting a user base of 703 million, Baidu is a cornerstone for Chinese consumers and advertisers alike. Consumers turn to Baidu for information, while advertisers swoon over the platform’s expansive reach, enabling precise advertising targeting.

Delving beyond its core business, Baidu has spread its tendrils into artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and autonomous driving sectors. By funneling profits from its search engine enterprise into these innovative ventures, Baidu has cultivated a diversified revenue stream over time.

On the flip side, JD.com has traditionally focused on tangible products and services. Often labeled the Amazon of China, JD operates a colossal e-commerce marketplace that caters to both first- and third-party sellers, offering consumers competitive prices. While its infrastructure investments have ensured swift and reliable deliveries, the costs of maintaining this logistics network gnaw at JD’s margins, unlike Baidu’s asset-light business model.

Acknowledging the vulnerabilities in its core business, JD has branched out into asset-light domains like healthcare and fintech. This strategic pivot aims to offset the slender margins of its e-commerce unit with brawnier service revenues.

Evaluating Opportunities and Risks

Given the stark contrasts in their operational blueprints, Baidu and JD’s fortunes hinge on divergent variables.

Take Baidu, for instance. As an AI pioneer, its growth trajectory is entwined with China’s AI evolution and Baidu’s adeptness in seizing this golden opportunity. With the Chinese AI market forecasted to balloon to $155 billion by 2030, even a sliver of this market could spell monumental gains for Baidu.

Furthermore, Baidu’s self-driving ride-hailing service holds promise, having ferried over seven million passengers to date. Yet, Baidu grapples with stumbling blocks in its core search engine business, evidenced by a 2% dip in online marketing revenue in Q2 2024. Investors are advised to monitor this segment closely for signs of a rebound.

Similarly, JD confronts headwinds in its e-commerce core as rivals like Alibaba and Pinduoduo loom large. Although product revenue stagnated in Q2 2024, JD’s foray into non-traditional services has provided a cushion against the dwindling sales. For JD, future growth hinges on outmaneuvering its e-commerce peers and leveraging budding ventures like JD Logistics and JD Healthcare.

Deciphering the Ideal Investment

So, the burning question – which stock should savvy investors hitch their wagon to?

The answer isn’t straightforward. These stocks are trading at a discount due to the prevailing apprehensions surrounding Chinese stocks. Venturing into Baidu or JD necessitates a tolerance for macro uncertainties and regulatory risks.

Moreover, the contrasting business models of these giants call for investors to assess their comfort zone. If the intricacies of one’s operations seem too labyrinthine or the associated risks too daunting, it might be best to steer clear.